Name of Rubik's Cube position with swapped corners & centers. This person isn't a good source for statistics or facts, but can be cited as an example of what people are thinking. Stack Exchange network consists of 176 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=CNN. I can go in UD, add a definition for something and just bot it to get 1000 upvotes. Words and usages become accepted simply because a sufficient number of people adopt them -- there are no "language engineers" updating and fixing the language. This doesn't really devalidate CNN as a source, as this is an editorial and it (being the urban dictionary quote) is utilized as a opinion of the public. (It isn't the articles job to give another quote saying the Carol's fine bc it is an opinion article, not a news source). In other words, I don't think the UD reference is the sole cause of the downvotes, but it's the UD reference absent any other supporting research for this particular question. Ano ang pinakamaliit na kontinente sa mundo? Given the lack of credentials of its contributors, and the absence of any quality threshold, I think expecting more from it than that would be asking too much. In case this is not just sarcasm, here's a counterpoint. Of course not. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. He is in all of us minds.? Someone that you know is telling the truth and you can depend on. @ekhimoro: that's why French is losing out in world popularity as compared to English. dictionary editorial boards?). --> But the thumbs-up/thumbs-down voting system, as well as the clustering of similar/divergent definitions, does give a useful sense of the degree of consensus about its meaning. @Mark Don't forget obscure (and, in many cases, completely unique) racial slurs! ur personality and its like being stalked. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Service. The reason I ask this is because an answer I gave to a question quoted an Urban Dictionary definition and received 2 downvotes without any explanation as to why. As it stands now, it seems like the O.P. @Barmar - I don't want to get into a debate about language engineers (a.k.a. It's the host of the radio show, Glenn Anderson, who used Urban Dictionary. But if Open Dictionary looks useful, I'll use it. I'm already familiar with terms like braggart, but I'm looking for Urban Dictionary, now in its 20th year, is a digital repository that contains more than 8 million definitions and famously houses all manner of slang and cultural expressions. The woman in the song isn't protesting because she doesn't want to stay, she's protecting because she's afraid of what the social consequences will be if she does and the blowback from her family in particular. They would never know if they where reading fact or fiction, just one person's opinion etc.. Ultimately, there is so much random noise at Urban Dictionary that trying to extract a useful definition there can be more arduous and less rewarding than visiting a handful of online publications that happen to use a particular slang term and trying to glean its meaning there. I don't know why you presume to know my mind. and slang – something that might not have made its way into a dictionary yet. Could anyone please tell me what (if anything) is wrong with my answer? I am very interested in the meanings and origins of words and phrases—and yet I think that I've used Urban Dictionary as a reference source in my answers exactly once, in response to the question What does “fleek” mean and when was it first used? Note the wisdom of crowds. That experience left me with the strong impression that Urban Dictionary is a very unreliable source of accurate real-world definitions, in addition to offering virtually no practical insight into how the meanings of words and phrases have evolved over time. Why do they say that one loses a little beauty every time they make a wish. That is probably both its strength and its chief limitation: it provides, potentially, a set of narrow-angle amateur definitions from a great many contributors from who-knows-where, but usually little indication of how a given expression arose (and hence very few, if any, attested or cited sources). Urban Dictionary? It is a meaningful, true observation which impacts UD's quality as a source. Who created the Urban Dictionary? But I would then prefer to call them "language ideologues". The first person is correct (it was me, on another account. Back to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange. I looked at 5 different polls and the average was about 6% of voters thought it was offensive. The first person is correct (it was me, on another account. If the hand is between 3 and 6 the guess is B. A quick scan of the definitions give you a reliable definition of the term. The audience on Millionaire has been right 95% of the time - much more than the experts are). Edit: Additionally, people are saying this is bad journalism but that doesn't make sense either. I wish people would use the old saying of sticks and stone, and just turn the station if they don't like what they are hearing. CNN: The most trusted name in fake news. Political terms are especially thorny; they're a great way to separate conservative visitors from liberals. ***PLEASE*** read all of the sidebar before posting, thanks! A single particular high school is unlikely to amass 10k upvotes. Urban Dictionary is like Wikipedia - super cool for certain words or certain kinds of research, but very unreliable and flaky. : reliable information. And even then, I was more interested in investigating the theory that an Urban Dictionary user was the original source of the phrase "on fleek" than in relying on its multitude of arbitrary, sometime-compatible/sometimes-contradictory definitions for my understanding of the phrase. Why don't libraries smell like bookstores? This question was a joke. To try to control a language by committee is a good way to doom it to becoming a dead language. Trusting their definitions as a language learner is not a good idea. Does Jerry Seinfeld have Parkinson's disease?