237, 241, 246, 247, 254, 255.] Adobe DRM (3.9 / 5.0 – 2 customer ratings) From its formation in 1944, the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) was one of the most powerful and important players on the British political and industrial stage. ... (see Smith v Croft (No 2) 1988 Ch 114). The fines assessed were serious, totaling over $52 million.5 Under such circumstances, 5 "[P]etty contempt like other petty criminal offenses may be tried without a jury," Taylor v. wrongdoers are in control. Thomas v National Union of Mineworkers (South Wales Area): ChD 1985 References: [1986] Ch 20, [1985] 2 All ER 1, [1985] IRLR 157, [1985] ICR 886, [1985] 2 WLR 1081 Coram: Scot J Nee Nee v TLNZ Auckland Ltd [2006] 1 ERNZ 95 (EmpC) 216. See, Taylor v National Union of Mineworkers (Debyshire Area) (1985) BCLC 237. The union's contumacy lasted many months and spanned a substantial portion of the State. An individual shareholder has locus standi to bring proceedings on ^ behalf of the company, to recover assets, where there has been misappropriation, or an ultra vires transaction, and not merely a right to National Coal Board v National Union of Mineworkers: 1986. National Union of Mineworkers obo Manganye v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR 793/2007) [2010] ZALC 262 (8 December 2010) BP South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Pule and Others (JR810/01) [2010] ZALC 261 (8 December 2010) New Zealand Air Line Pilots’ Assoc Inc v Air New Zealand Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 168 73 The former position in relation to deriatie actions before the introduction of the new procedure in Part11oftheCompaniesAct206,hichcameintoforce 27 (1915) 1 Ch. In Taylor v National Union of Mineworkers (Derbyshire Area) [1985] BCLC 237 at 241, Vinelott J held that officers of a trade union owed it a fiduciary duty, which included a duty not to misappropriate funds. Taylor v. National Union of Mineworkers (Derbyshire Area) [1985] B.C.L.C. National Union of Mineworkers (Sequestration) (Hansard, 19 December 1984) ... That was due to a civil action brought to the courts — Taylor and Foulstone v. the NUM. Search for: Areas of Law: Administrative (1,044) Adoption (399) Agency (595) Agriculture (746) National Union of Mineworkers and Another v Black Mountain Mining (Pty) Ltd (CA22/2012) [2014] ZALAC 78 (10 December 2014) Kalahari Country Club v National Union of Mineworkers and Another (CA16/2013) [2014] ZALAC 80; [2015] 4 BLLR 410 (LAC); (2015) … National Westminster v Morgan [1985] AC 686 99. Vice Presidents of the National Union of Mineworkers (Great Britain)‎ (21 P) Pages in category "Leaders of British trade unions" The following 183 pages are in this category, out of 183 total. ABOUT THE COMPANY – JB MARKS EDUCATION TRUST FUND. director(s) did not control the compan (Taylor v National Union of Mineworkers (1985) BCLC 237). 28 Wedderburn, K.W., “Shareholders’ right and the rule in Foss v Harbottle” Cambridge Law Journal Vol. 194 1957 p 207. Support. I am not quite sure what that word means. References: [1986] IRLR 439, [1986] ICR 736 ... Next Next post: Taylor v John Webster Buildings Civil Engineering: EAT 1999. National Coal Board v National Union of Mineworkers [1986] IRLR 439 72. Andrew Taylor NUM and British Politics Volume 1: 1944-1968. Since the wrong done is to the company directly, then the company is the only recognized claimant. In Haselhurst v Wright (1991) 4 ACSR 527, Owen J held that although a The Attorney-General said that the Government would indemnify. 503. The JB Marks Education Trust Fund was formed in 1997 by the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM), as a means to address the need for empowering NUM members and dependents of NUM members, specifically those studying towards qualifications in the construction, mining and energy sectors. New South Wales v Paige (2002) 115 IR 283 127, 135, 251. That is important, because it is the issue that we are debating tonight. 11.